Posted in Deep Foundations, TAMWAVE

TAMWAVE: Pile Toe Resistance, and Some More on Pile Shaft Resistance

Update: the original intent for TAMWAVE was to use correlations based on CPT data.  While these correlations have validity, for TAMWAVE this was abandoned, and the reason for that is discussed in this post.

With this post we begin to discuss our “other” project: the TAMWAVE project.  It’s been around a long time but is now being revised.  The concept is to afford students a method of getting acquainted with several aspects of computer-aided driven pile design, including the following:

  • Estimating axial capacity of the pile;
  • Estimating the axial load-settlement of the pile;
  • Estimating the lateral load-settlement of the pile; and
  • Determining the drivability of the pile with a given hammer.

The current version of the online software is here.  One thing we’re doing is to designate the entire project as “TAMWAVE,” even though much of the routine isn’t really part of the wave equation program.

When most of the methods we use today were developed back around forty years ago and earlier, there wasn’t a really good way to distribute them away from mainframe computers.  The advent of DOS changed that, but with the shift towards Windows software most of these packages’ successors became proprietary.  Today we have DOSBOX to run these programs but current students, glued as they have been the last decade to their smartphones, find these hard to use. And, although geotechnical engineering isn’t the fastest moving branch of civil engineering, newer methods have been developed to analyse driven piles.

Overview of Toe Resistance

We’ve discussed in detail some newer methods of estimating the shaft resistance of driven piles, for sands and clays.  Although the original idea was to use them to enhance STADYN, they’re certainly applicable here, albeit with a few modifications.

With toe resistance, one of the advantages of 3D FEA code like STADYN is that it obviates (in theory at least) the need to estimate the toe resistance of the pile, let alone its progressive mobilisation.  That’s illustrated for drilled shafts in Han, Salgado, Prezzi and Lim (2016).  That’s not the case with a 1D routine like TAMWAVE, and so consider we must the toe resistance.  Han, Salgado, Prezzi and Zaheer (2016) (to whom we had recourse earlier) have a convenient listing of the toe methods that “go” with the shaft methods we discussed earlier, along with many others.

Starting with the toe resistance in sand, we have the following:

q_b = \left( 1-0.0058D_r \right)q_c

In this case q_b is the unit toe resistance of the pile, D_r is the relative density in percent, and q_c is the uncorrected cone resistance.  For toe resistance there are several schemes for averaging q_c around the toe, dating back to Schmertmann’s research, which is discussed in Fellenius.

For clays, the corresponding formula to Kolk and van der Velde (1996) is this:

q_b = 0.7 \left( q_t - \sigma_{vo\,toe}\right)

q_t is the corrected cone resistance at the toe; correction of q_c is also discussed in Fellenius\sigma_{vo\,toe} is the vertical total stress at the toe.

Soil Property Input and CPT Implementation

The original routine used the method of Dennis and Olson which really requires choosing whether the soil is cohesive or cohesionless and then answering some additional questions which are specific to the method.  The bifurcation of methods between the two soil types for driven piles is common but misleading; soils are seldom entirely one or the other but exhibit characteristics of both.  We plan to address this issue later for STADYN but for now we will stick with it for TAMWAVE.

One of TAMWAVE’s features which is carried over before is that there is only one soil type allowed for the entire length of the pile.  This is largely to preserve the academic nature of the software and discourage commercial use (which is prohibited anyway.)  That simplifies the writing of the code considerably but we must still choose how we should input the soil properties.

For the new version of TAMWAVE we opted to input the soil properties using two parameters.  The first is the two-letter unified code (SM, ML, etc.) for the characteristic soil type for the pile under consideration.  The second is the consistency or density of the soils, which is given using the verbal designations (“loose,” “hard,” etc.) which are customary in geotechnical engineering.  These are translated into actual properties using the “typical” correlations found in the Soils and Foundations Manual and are shown at the top of the page.  This isn’t a very exact method of proceeding but for the purpose of the routine it is adequate.

Use of these correlations gives us the following information:

  • Unit weight of the soil
  • Internal friction angle (cohesionless soils) or undrained shear strength/unconfined compression strength (cohesive soils)
  • SPT blow counts, generally corrected to N_{60} .

Conspicuously absent from this list are CPT results.  The general trend in pile capacity formulae in recent years is to correlate them to CPT results.  While the advantages of CPT testing are undeniable (and it’s certainly more consistent than SPT testing) the fact is that many of the soil borings that practitioners deal with feature SPT data, as do the typical values that TAMWAVE adopts.  Fortunately we have the correlations developed by Robertson and Campanella which relate the two.  Since the relationship between the two is based upon soil type, and we have that already, it is possible to automate the process and estimate equivalent CPT data from the typical SPT data we already have.  This relationship (and its limitations) is discussed in detail in Fellenius.

Randolph’s Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient in Sand using CPT Data

In this post we discussed Randolph’s lateral earth pressure coefficient for sands.  The value for K_{max} can also be determined using CPT data as follows:

K_{max} = 0.02 \frac{q_c}{\sigma'_{vo}}

The rest of the formula is the same.

Conclusion

We have developed a new method of inputting soil data into this routine, along with outlining new methods of estimating the ultimate capacity of piles.  It is now necessary to implement these, which we will outline in a subsequent post.

References

  • Fei Han, Rodrigo Salgado, Monica Prezzi, Jeehee Lim. (2016) “Shaft and base resistance of non-displacement piles in sand.” Computers and Geotechnics, Volume 83, 2017, Pages 184-197, ISSN 0266-352X,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.11.006
Posted in Deep Foundations, STADYN

Shaft Friction for Driven Piles in Clay: Alpha or Beta Methods?

In a previous post we discussed beta methods for driven pile shaft friction in sands, which are pretty much accepted, although (as always) the values for \beta can vary from one formulation to the next.  With clays, also as always, things are more complicated.

Since the researches of Tomlinson in the 1950’s, the shaft friction of piles in clays has been thought to be a function of the undrained shear strength of the clay multiplied by an adhesion factor \alpha , thus

f_s = \alpha c_u

This was seriously challenged by Burland (1973) who noted the following:

Whereas the use of undrained shear strength for calculating the end bearing capacity of a pile appears justified there seems little fundamental justification for relating shaft adhesion to undrained strength for the following reasons:

  1. the major shear distortion is confined to a relatively thin zone around the pile shaft (Cooke and Price (1973)).  Drainage either to or from this narrow zone will therefore take place rapidly during loading;

  2. the installation of a pile, whether driven or cast-in situ, inevitably must disturb and remould the ground adjacent to the pile shaft;

  3. quite apart from the disturbance caused by the pile there is no simple relationship between the undrained strength and drained strength of the ground.

Burland buttressed his case by noting that

\beta = K tan \phi

and presenting a graph similar to the following:

Beta Image 1

where, as seen earlier,

  • K_o = 1 - sin \phi is in red.
  • tan \phi is in blue.
  • \beta is in green.

Since, for the ranges of drained friction angles for clay (20-25 deg.) the value for \beta was relatively constant, value of \beta were relatively invariant with friction angle, and thus could be estimated with relative accuracy.  His empirical correlation was very successful with soft clays, not as much with stiff ones.

The year after Burland made his proposal, McClelland (1974) noted the following:

It is not surprising that there is a growing dissatisfaction with attempts to solve this problem through correlations of \alpha with c_u .  This is accompanied by a growing conviction that pile support in clay is frictional in character–that load transfer is dependent upon the effective lateral pressure acting against the side of the pile after it is driven.

However, \beta methods–which would embody McClelland’s preferred idea–have never been universally accepted for pile shaft friction in clays.  A large part of the problem, as noted by Randolph, Carter and Wroth (1979) is that the lateral pressure itself is dependent upon the undrained shear strength of the soils.  It is thus impossible to completely discount the effect of undrained shear strength on the shaft friction, even with the remoulding Burland and others have noted.

This has led to the “hybrid” approach of considering both undrained shear strength and effective stress.  This is embodied in the American Petroleum Institute (2002) specification.  A more advanced version of this is given in Kolk and van der Velde (1996).  They give the \alpha factor as

\alpha = 0.9\left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)^{-0.2} \left( \frac {c_u} {\sigma'_{vo}} \right)^{-0.3} \leq 1

The notation is the same as in this post except that we add c_u , which is the undrained shear strength.

In this case the unit shaft friction is given by the equation

f_s = 0.9\left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)^{-0.2} \left( \frac {c_u} {\sigma'_{vo}} \right)^{-0.3} c_u

There are a couple of things worth noting about this.

The first is that we can transform this into a \beta method of the form

f_s = \beta \sigma'_{vo}

with the following multiplication

f_s = 0.9\left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)^{-0.2} \left( \frac {c_u} {\sigma'_{vo}} \right)^{0.7} \sigma'_{vo}

(A similar operation appears in Randolph (2005).)

in which case

\beta = 0.9\left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)^{-0.2} \left( \frac {c_u} {\sigma'_{vo}} \right)^{0.7}

The only thing we would have to do is to find a way to incorporate the limiting condition for \alpha , which we will discuss shortly.

The second thing is that the term \left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right) appears in both this formulation and that for sands in this post.  The difference is that, while Kolk and van der Velde (1996) use the term in a power relationship, Randolph (2005) uses it in an exponential way.  The basic concept in both is the same: the term is at a maximum at the pile toe and decays toward the mudline.

The two are compared in the figure below.

kandvdv-vs-randolph

Here the quantity \left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right) is at the x-axis and the following is at the y-axis:

  • Kolk and van der Velde Method for Clays, \left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)^{-0.2} in red.
  • Randolph Method for Sands, e^{-\mu \left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)} in blue, where \mu = 0.05 .
  • e^{-\mu \left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)} in green, where \mu = 0.02 .

The graph illustrates the problem (from a computational standpoint) with the Kolk and van der Velde method: there is a singularity in their coefficient using the power relationship at the pile toe, while the exponential relationship yields a value of unity at this point.  The last correlation in green is approximately the best fit of the exponential relationship with the power relationship of Kolk and van der Velde, using either 1-norm or 2-norm methods.  It is not very good; it would be interesting, however, to see what kind of value for \mu might result if this had been in Kolk and van der Velde’s original statistical correlation equation.

In view of all this, perhaps the best way to enforce the limit is to do so as follows:

\left( \frac {L-z} {d} \right)\geq1

From all this, we can say that it is certainly possible to compute shaft friction for driven piles with a \beta method provided we include the effects of the undrained shear strength.

References

In addition to the original study and previous posts, the following references are noted:

Kolk, A.J., and van der Velde, A. (1996) “A Reliable Method to Determine Friction
Capacity of Piles Driven into Clays.” Proceedings of the 28th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, 6-9 May.  OTC 7993.

McClelland, B. (1974) “Design of Deep Penetration Piles for Ocean Structures.”  Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 111, July.

Posted in Deep Foundations

Deep Foundations for Transportation Facilities: A Historic Perspective

This is a presentation slide show given by Mr. John G. Delphia, Texas Department of Transportation, Bridge Division, Geotechnical Branch Manager.  It’s a nice overview of deep foundations for transportation structures, including both drilled shafts (which TxDOT has excelled at since the days of O’Neill and Reese) and driven piles.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In addition to our own terms and conditions, please note the terms and conditions of the slide show, which are contained in the last slide and which we agree with.  We should also note that this slide show contains content from our companion site vulcanhammer.info, especially from our pages on differential acting hammers, leaders and onshore hammers.

Posted in Academic Issues, Deep Foundations, Geotechnical Engineering

Tribute to Harry M. Coyle

It is with sadness that we report the death of Dr. Harry M. Coyle, professor of civil engineering at Texas A&M University from 1964 to 1987, back in January.  The obituary is below.

For those of us involved in deep foundations, his name is a familiar one, and his monographs have graced this site and its companion, vulcanhammer.info, for many years.  Among other things he is known for the Coyle and Castello method for estimating pile capacity in sand, the Coyle and Gibson method for determining damping for pile dynamics analysis, and the co-developer of the PX4C3 routine for axial load-settlement estimation, which we feature on this site, and which is the ancestor of many of those in use today.  He was deeply involved in the development of the TTI wave equation program, and some of his work relating to that is here.

Our continued condolences and prayers go to his family, and, as the obituary states, “Having loved his friends and family well, Harry Coyle will be missed by all until we are reunited with him in Glory. “

Obituary

Harry Michael Coyle, 90, entered the presence of his Savior on January 18, 2017. He was born on January 7, 1927 in Johnstown, PA to Foster H. and Ruth Enid Michael Coyle. Graduating from Richland Township, PA schools, Harry briefly enlisted in the Army, then won an appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point, where he graduated in 1950. He earned a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering in 1956 from MIT and a PhD in 1963 from the University of Texas at Austin.

Harry met the love of his life, Josephine (Jo-Jo) Oefinger on a blind date in Washington, DC in 1954. It was love at first sight. Among other things, Harry told her, “Your eyes are like limpid pools and I could drown in them.” The star-struck couple married on March 26, 1955. Their love story lasted through 56 years of marriage at her death in 2011, and until this day.

Colonel Coyle actively served his country in the Army Corps of Engineers for 12 years: in Alaska after graduation from West Point; at Ft. Belvoir, VA (where his daughter, Debbie, was born in 1956); in a deployment to Korea in 1957 (during which daughter, Jenifer, was born in San Antonio); and on faculty at West Point (where son, Michael, was born in 1960). He then served as an officer in the U.S. Army Reserves while earning his PhD in Austin, where son, Pat, was born in 1963. Ultimately, he attained the rank of Colonel in 1973 and retired in 1987.

With his PhD in hand, Dr. Coyle took a job at Texas A&M University in the Civil Engineering Department in 1964, and moved the family to Bryan, Texas. A popular faculty member, he energetically served his Aggie colleagues and students until his retirement in 1987.

It was in the BCS community that Harry’s commitment and desire to serve his Lord blossomed. He and Jo-Jo became founding members of Grace Bible Church, where Harry served many years on the Board of Elders, eventually becoming an Elder Emeritus. For 50 years at Grace, he shared his deep faith and knowledge of the Bible with hundreds of students and many adults through small group teaching and one on one mentoring. Harry and Jo-Jo founded the Adopt An Aggie program at Grace, patterned after West Point’s adopt a plebe program. Known as a prayer warrior, Harry spent hours a day lifting up the needs of others, and he helped spread the Gospel of Christ throughout the world via financial and prayerful support of many missionaries. He continued to disciple, support and inspire others until his death. Having loved his friends and family well, Harry Coyle will be missed by all until we are reunited with him in Glory.

He was preceded in death by his parents, his beloved wife Jo-Jo, and his dear son Michael. Harry is survived by daughter Debbie Barry (and her children Julia and Andrew) of Belmont, MA; daughter Jenifer Purvis and husband Karl (and their children Kelsey and fiancée Scott Lorg, and Matthew and wife Morgan) of Berryton, KS; daughter-in-law Beth Gibson Coyle Faris of Boerne, TX and her daughters Christen (and husband Jacob) Kennington and Lauren (and husband Christopher) Orgeron of Houston, TX; son Patrick Coyle and wife Jeanne (and their children Katie, David and Lexie) of Bryan, TX ; and sister Lucretia Ann Cucciardo of Tampa, FL, and many loving nieces, nephews and cousins. Beloved great-grandchildren are Micah and Claire Orgeron, and Riley and Reagan Kennington.

A visitation will be held from 6:30 – 8:30 PM on Sunday, January 22, 2017 at Hillier Funeral Home of Bryan. A celebration of Harry’s life will be held at 11:30 a.m. on Monday, January 23, 2017 at Grace Bible Church, 700 Anderson Street, College Station. Memorial gifts may be given to Grace Bible Church Missionary House, 700 Anderson Street, College Station TX 77840; or Hospice Brazos Valley, 502 W. 26th St., Bryan, TX 77803.

Posted in Deep Foundations, Pile Driving Equipment

Closed Form Solution of the Wave Equation for Piles

Overview

“…your impressive MS thesis would be a dissertation in most places.” Dr. J. Don Murff, PhD, Texas A&M University, Retired geotechnical engineer, Exxon

“This thesis is skilfully written and a delight to experience. My respect and congratulations.” Dr. Deborah Arfken, Professor of Political Science and former Dean of the Graduate School, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

“You did such an excellent work in this thesis!” Liu Chao, researcher.

When people speak of “using the wave equation” for their piling problems, they’re seldom referring to a formula but to a numerical method and usually a computer program and/or an instrumentation technique in the case of in situ tests. Yet, when the wave equation is studied in elementary differential equations, some kind of “equation” or formula can be derived. How it looks obviously depends on the boundary and initial conditions of the problem.

Such results are “closed form solutions.” While stress wave propagation in piles is a complex, non-linear problem, some useful information can be obtained from a closed form solution, if only to check the numerical methods for underlying problems.

An attempt at such a solution was undertaken by Don C. Warrington at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga; his result is documented in the master’s thesis Closed Form Solution of the Wave Equation for Piles.  In addition to the thesis itself, we have the defence slideshow, abstract, preface and some papers related to the thesis.

Thesis Slideshow

Download Closed Form Solution of the Wave Equation for Piles

Abstract

This thesis details the research into the one-dimensional wave equation as applied to piles used in the support of structures for civil works and driven using impact equipment. Since the 1950’s, numerical methods, both finite difference and finite element, have been used extensively for the analysis of piles during driving and are the most accepted method of analysis for the determination of driving stresses, dynamic and static resistance of piles. In this thesis the wave equation is solved in a relatively simple closed form without recourse to numerical methods. A review of past efforts to solve the wave equation in closed form is included. Problems that appear in previous related works are discussed and derived again, including the Prescott-Laura problem of the cable system stopped at one end and the solution of a hammer/cushion/cap/pile system for a semi-infinite pile. The latter is used to assist in the determination of a pile top force-time function that can be used to simulate the impact of the hammer on the pile. The basic equations, initial and boundary conditions are detailed, with the parameters adjusted to match actual soil dynamic behaviour while at the same time being a form convenient for closed form solution. To avoid difficulties due to spectral elements in the boundary conditions, a strain-based model of the radiation dampening in the pile toe was developed. The solution technique uses a Laplace transform of the semi-infinite pile problem for 0 < t < L/c (or for a time duration 0 < t < d, where d < L/c) and a Fourier series solution of the Sturm-Liouville problem thereafter. This solution is applied both to undamped and damped wave equations. The work includes comparison with existing numerical methods such as WEAP87, ANSYS, and Newmark’s method using Maple V.

Preface

Let us consider that if the ancients had kept to this deference of daring to add nothing to the knowledge transmitted to them and if their contemporaries had been as much opposed to accepting anything new, they would have deprived both themselves and their posterity of the fruit of their discoveries. Just as they used the discoveries handed down to them only as the means of making new ones, and that happy daring had opened the road for them to great achievements, so we should take the discoveries won for us by them in the same spirit, and following their example make these discoveries the means and not the end of our study, and thus by imitating the ancients try to surpass them.

This quotation, taken from the Preface to the Treatise on the Vacuum by the French scientist and Christian thinker Blaise Pascal, is as fitting way of beginning such a work as this as one can find. Although the wave equation itself has been investigated since the days of Bernoulli, the application of stress-wave theory to piles is relatively recent, going back to the early 1930’s. Although it is an exaggeration to refer to those who first investigated these matters as “ancients,” given the acceleration of the growth of knowledge and the application of technology the time between the first investigations of this problem and the present is in reality rather long.

In any investigation such as this the ideal goal is to come up with something truly novel, and many of such works emphasize their novelty to the denigration of those who have gone on before. While in some fields of endeavour this might be appropriate, in this case such sweeping novelty cannot be claimed. This work fits the mould as outlined by Pascal above: it takes the work that has been done before, advances it a step while realizing that there are many more steps before “perfection” is achieved.

The use of the analysis of stress waves in piles to determine everything from the performance of the hammer to the capacity of the pile is widespread today. Most of these methods use numerical methods for the analysis. The use of numerical methods came rather early in this history of stress wave application to piles, earlier in fact than the computer power really needed for practical application was readily available. Closed form solutions were either abandoned entirely or applied on a limited basis or in an ancillary way to other techniques.

The acceptance of these methods without a way to really compare them with some kind of “theoretical” result have left some involved in the analysis of pile driving uneasy as to the theoretical basis of the solutions employed. A great deal of work has been done to correlate the numerical models with field data. But are these adjustments being made to actual field phenomena or to underlying deficiencies in the methods we are using? The answer to this question is critical because without a solution to this problem we may be solving the wrong problem, and thus guaranteeing surprises in the future when a breakdown in our corrections is induced by unforeseen conditions. This is especially important in a geotechnical problem because the variables in a problem are generally complex and inadequately quantified.

It is for this reason that we are “backtracking” to a closed form solution in this thesis. In doing this we are forced to take a hard look at the underlying mathematical theory of the wave equation as it can be applied to piles. Putting together sound mathematical application with the basic physics of the problem is something that is frequently lacking (generally through no fault of the investigators) in works in this field. While in this thesis we have attempted to accomplish this, we have both applied mathematics in a different way and in the process acquired a new sense of humility because the complexity of the problem stretches the mathematics applied to the limit.

With these thoughts we proceed to our subject, realizing that we are indebted to those who have gone before us and hoping to be yet another link in the chain of knowledge and understanding to those who might come after. With regard to understanding, however, we close with a quotation from the great Jewish scholar Moses Maimonides, from his Guide to the Perplexed:

My son, so long as you are engaged in studying the Mathematical Sciences and Logic, you belong to those who go round about the palace in search of the gate…When you understand Physics, you have entered the hall; and when, after completing the study of Natural Philosophy, you master Metaphysics, you have entered the innermost court, and are with the king in the palace. You have attained the degree of the wise men, who include men of different grades of perfection. There are some who direct all their mind toward the attainment of perfection in Metaphysics, devote themselves entirely to God, exclude from their thought every other thing, and employ all their intellectual faculties in the study of the Universe, in order to derive therefrom a proof for the existence of God , and to learn in every possible way how God rules all things; they form the class of those who have entered the palace, namely the class of prophets.

Related Articles

Application of the Closed Form Solution for the Damped Wave Wave Equation to Piles

This paper presents the application of the closed form solution for the damped wave equation to piles. The wave equation in numerical solution has been used for many years, generally without even a simple closed form counterpart. In this paper the closed form solution for the damped wave equation will first be stated and related to an actual pile driven into the soil. Following this is a discussion of the boundary conditions: the hammer at the pile top and the soil response at the pile toe. To avoid spectral components in the Fourier series eigenvalues and to preserve orthogonality, a new strain based soil model to simulate radiation dampening from the pile toe is proposed. A solution to this equation which involves the solution of the semi-infinite pile using Laplace transform for the first part of the impact followed by a Fourier series solution for the remainder. Comparison with numerical methods for a sample case is also presented.

Application of Wave Propagation Theory in Pile Dynamics

David Espinoza
Purdue University
December 1991

Pile foundations are commonly used for off-shore structures, bridge supports, in areas were the applied loads cannot be supported by the underlying soil and they have to be transferred to a more competent stratum. It is clear that the amount of load that each pile can support will depend on the resistance characteristics of the surrounding soil (shaft friction) as well as the soill beneath the pile (tip resistance). In order to evaluate much load each pile can support a number of models based on the one-dimensional wave equation have been presented. These models are used to predict the stresses on driven piles induced by impact loads as well as the permanent displacements associated with these impact loads. The soil dynamic resistance is modelled as a system of spring and dashpots concentrated at the nodes. The numerical procedures usually employed in the solution of these problems are finite differences and finite element. In the solution scheme, the soil resistance is assumed to be elasto-plastic, i.e. proportional to the soil displacement up to a given maximum value. The non-linear behaviour of the soil resistance restricts the use of spectral analysis for this type of problems. Nonetheless, spectral analysis can be used for cases where the impact loadings are small enough that the soil response is within the elastic range.

Applied Elasticity

John Prescott
College of Technology, Manchester

An excellent textbook on the subject, including mechanics of materials, bending, torsion, cylinders, places, strings and rods. The last featured the Prescott-Laura problem which was crucial in the development of the closed form solution.

Comparison of Numerical Methods to Closed Form Solution for Wave Equation Analysis of Piling

This paper documents both the development of a closed form solution for the one-dimensional wave equation as it is applied to piles and its comparison to numerical solutions of the same problem. Wave mechanics have been used extensively in piles for many years but the solution of the wave equation has been almost exclusively a numerical one. The closed form solution used involves the solution of the semi-infinite pile solution immediately after impact and a Fourier series solution for times thereafter. This solution is compared with numerical solutions of different kinds for a given test case. The comparison shows variations between the closed form solution and the numerical methods that, although not egregious, are also not consistent from case to case. A wider variety of cases is needed to come to more general conclusions about the variations in these methods.

Deflections of Pile Toe Plates on Elastic Foundations

This paper is an analysis of pile toe plates that are assumed to interact with elastic foundations. A solution to the deflection and moment equations is derived and discovered to be in fact made up of Bessel functions with complex arguments. A solution based on the analysis of the series that make up the Bessel functions is performed. The solution is presented in the form of charts based on dimensionless parameters. A sample case is analysed and discussed.

Development and Potential of the Wave Equation in Closed Form as Applied to Pile Dynamics

This paper is a review and summary of the efforts made to develop a closed form solution of the wave equation as applied to driven piles. It discusses the early development of solutions and includes discussion of such topics as semi-infinite piles, solutions using both Fourier series and the method of images, and solutions specific to vibratory hammers. Results, advantages, and limitations of each of these methods are discussed. The rationale for the use of closed form solutions as opposed to the numerical ones is set forth. The paper concludes with a discussion of the possibilities of future research and sets forth the requirements for making this research successful.

Numerical Analysis of Pile Driving Dynamics

Andrew J. Deeks
University of Western Australia
1992

The use of foundation piles to support structures over water or soil with inadequate bearing capacity dates from pre-historical times. Although the use of cast in-situ piles has become popular in recent years, piles are commonly driven into the ground with some type of hammer. Until the nineteenth century, the size and number of piles required to support a particular structure, and the hammer required to install those piles, were determined by rules of thumb and experience.

As scientific engineering expanded, formulae for pile capacity and drivability were developed. Pile drivability formulae initially represented a correlation of empirical data, and later formulae were based on a combination of basic mechanics and empirical data.

Although the dynamics of pile driving were appreciated early in the twentieth century, a practical method of solving the pile driving wave equation was not developed until the advent of digital computers. The method then developed employed an empirical model of the soil surrounding the driven pile. The one-dimensional wave equation is still the primary means of analysing pile drivability today. The last thirty years have seen various improvements made to the original method. Much additional data has been collected, allowing the empirical soil parameters to be refined, and the computational techniques have been improved.

Because of the wealth of experience and data, the current techniques provide satisfactory solutions for most practical pile drivability problems today. However, there are some cases, particularly in the offshore engineering field, in which piles of unusual size must be driven into soils which are uncommon on land. Since a large empirical database is not available, the parameters required for the standard wave equation analysis can be difficult to determine. This has motivated attempts to formulate a numerical model relying only on fundamental soil properties, which can be measured by standard geotechnical investigation methods. The finite element method has been used to analyse pile drivability occasionally, but the highly transient dynamics of the stress wave propagation and the non-linear behaviour of the soil cause such a solution to be computationally expensive.

Several models based on the one-dimensional wave equation and measurable soil parameters have been proposed. The finite element method has been used previously in attempts to verify these models, but the lack of a conclusive comparison in the literature suggests that these attempts have been less than successful. The coarseness of the finite element meshes used in these studies has led to some concern.

This thesis is a contribution to the process of finding a suitable one-dimensional model, based on measurable soil parameters, which adequately represents the pile driving process. The finite element method is used to accurately analyse the response of an ideal von Mises soil during a hammer blow on a full displacement pile. A one-dimensional model is developed which gives excellent agreement with the finite element results. In the process, doubt is cast on the accuracy of some of the finite element work previously reported in the literature, but the ability of one-dimensional wave equation models to represent pile driving behaviour is veritled.

Soil Motions Under Vibrating Foundations

This dissertation was co-directed by Spencer J. Buchanan, Distinguished Professor of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering at Texas A&M and before that founder and Chief of the Soil Mechanics Division of the U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station. The Spencer Buchanan Lecture at Texas A&M, an important lecture in geotechnical engineering, is named in his honour.John V. Perry (1924-2009) taught Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M (with some breaks) from 1948 until 1995.

On a lighter note, his department head, C.M. Simmang (who signed off on the dissertation,) was commenting to his class on a visit by the late President Gerald Ford to San Antonio in 1976. Shaking his head in disbelief, he said, “At least I had enough sense to shuck the tamale before I ate it.”

John Vivian Perry, Jr.
Texas A&M University
August 1963

This research was undertaken to determine the amount and extent of soil motions under vibrating foundations. The test soil was standard 20-30 Ottawa sand, ASTM C-190, that was contained in a one-meter cubical box. A force generator was mounted above the soil and applied dynamic loads to a circular footing. These were harmonic forces and were applied at frequencies between five and fifty cycles per second.

Three hundred and sixty-seven test runs were recorded on an electromagnetic oscillograph from signals generated by an acceIerometer buried in the soil. This acceIerometer was located at various depths beneath the center of a footing and, at other times, it was located beneath and offcenter. Other variables were the footings which had different diameters and masses.

Three empirical equations were developed from the test results using dimensional analysis. These equations were for maximum values of acceleration, velocity and displacement, respectively.

Static Versys Dynamic Pile Bearing Capacity

A. Holeyman

A brief (and in some ways controversial) discussion of dynamic capacity estimations, especially with high blow-count piles.

Vertical Motion of Rigid Footings

This work is a classic for soil dynamics in general and the response of soil to the vibration of foundations in particular. Lysmer’s simplification of the response equation was a major step forward in the rational analysis of this phenomenon.

Lysmer’s Analogue–which reduced the soil response of a rigid circular foundation to a single degree of freedom spring-dashpot system–also has found application in pile toe response to pile driving.

John Lysmer was for many years a Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of California at Berkeley. He passed away in 1999.

John Lysmer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract Report 3-115
University of Michigan
June 1965

This investigation includes a theoretical solution for a rigid footing, resting on an elastic half-space, which is subjected to steady-state vertical oscillation. It is shown how this steady-state solution can be used to describe the response of the footing to a transient pulse-type vertical loading.

After establishing the theoretical solution, and evaluating the approximations required for its development, it is further demonstrated that the theory permits evaluation of quantities which may represent spring constants and damping factors for use in the usual theory for vertical motion of a damped-one-degree-of freedom system. The agreement between the simple theory and elastic half-space theory is well within the limit required for engineering solutions.

The results of the study provide information from which the elastic dynamic response of rigid footings subjected to transient vertical loads may be evaluated. By taking advantage of such standard procedures as the phase-plane method, the dynamic response of footings may still be estimated even if the stresses in the soil extend into the inelastic range. A detailed discussion of the application of this method to inelastic settlements of vertically loaded footings will be presented in a subsequent report.

Finally, the theoretical developments included in this report for vertical oscillations may serve as a guide to develop similar theoretical evaluations of the dynamic response of rigid footings in other uncoupled modes of oscillation.