Note: this is an update from an earlier lecture, which actually combines two lectures as well. Some new equipment was used; however, the “live screen” method didn’t quite work out, which meant that I ended up putting the slides in the video during video editing. Since I point to the slides from time to time, this may end up with some awkward moments. I apologise for any inconvenience.
In this post, we will see the book Manual For The Systematic Study Of The Regime Of Underground Waters edited by M. Altovskij; A. Konopljantsev. About the book The manual, is divided into four chapters. The first chapter-general theoretical problems-treats underground water and its behaviour as a natural historical process reflecting certain peculiarities attendant upon […]
In this post, we will see the book General Geology by O. Lange; M. Ivanova; N. Lebedeva. About the book The book is a basic introduction to geology. The first two chapters talk about the origin of the Earth and its properties, and the outer geospheres of earth: the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and lithosphere. The […]
My institution has featured yet another one of my students who graduated last month, Ogheneruona Uwusiaba, from Nigeria.
“Ruona” (as we called her) was a very diligent student, and took all of the classes I taught (Soil Mechanics, Foundations and Fluid Mechanics Laboratory.) To be a student athlete, mother, engineering student and graduate Magna Cum Laude takes a special type of person, and Ruona is that.
This website–and by extension my teaching–goes around the world to the extent that more visits come from outside the U.S. than inside. Sometimes though the world comes to my classroom, and Ruona was a part of that.
Elastic solutions to stresses induced by loads at the surface have their limitations, but they allow the use of the principle of superposition. The principle of superposition states that you can add the effects of different loads on a single point. Superposition requires that the stress state of the point be path independent, which is the case with elastic conditions. No matter how you load and unload a point in a system, if elasticity is maintained the result will be the same for a given set of loads.
This is illustrated for point loads in the graphic below, but it applies to distributed loads (such as this and this) as well.
The stresses that result from each load affect the total stress at the point of interest. They can be computed and added together. So, since “point” loads are physically impossible, is their computation be useful? The answer to this question is “yes” but it takes some judgement, like so many things in geotechnical engineering.
There are three things we need to note here. The first is that the load on each column is 27 tons, and is the same for each column.
The second is that the “r” shown in the table above is not the same as it is for the point loads. The variable “r” for the point loads is the horizontal distance from the load to the point of interest.
The third is that there are three column positions shown in the diagram, with three corresponding values of r:
The column on top of the load, Column B2
The columns in the mid-point of the edges, Columns A2, B1, B3, and C2. These have an value of r of 15′ from the point of interest.
The columns in the corners of the square, Columns A1, A3, C1, and C3. These have a value of r of 21.2′ from the point of interest.
Now, instead of the chart, we apply the formula derived earlier for the influence coefficient, which is
from which the stress is computed by the equation
Using this formula, we can construction the table below for this problem.
(1) Z, ft
(2) r/Z for B2
(3) r/Z for A2, B1, B3, C2
(4) r/z for A1, A3, C1, C3
(5) K for B2
(6) K for A2, B1, B3, C2
(7) K for A1, A3, C1, C3
(8) Stress for B2, tsf
(9) Stress for each of A2, B1, B3, C2, tsf
(10) Stress for each of A1, A3, C1, C3, tst
(11) Total Stress at Z, tsf
Results from the Separate Column Footings problem in NAVFC DM 7.01, using point loads. Note that the stresses in Columns 9 and 10 are due to a single column, and not all four of them. The total stress in column (11) is the sum of the stress in Column 8 plus 4 times the result in Column 9 plus four times the result in Column 10.
We could have opted to add the influence coefficients and then compute the stresses since, for each elevation Z, both the elevation and the column load were the same. We did not for clarity; it is certainly possible to have columns of different loads.
The results are conservative, they tend to be higher, especially at the lower value elevations. It’s worth noting that the total stress at Z = 2′ is higher than the distributed loads on the footings. One way to make this better is to use the center formulae for stress under circles for Column B2 and point loads for the rest. Given, however, the limitations of the method in general, and the considerably lower effort in obtaining the influence coefficients, the method is a reasonable one to use.